Who Controls Your News
Just 6 corporations control 90% of all American media. These companies are controlled by approximately 15 billionaire families who determine what narratives reach the public. About 232 media executives make editorial decisions affecting what 330+ million Americans see, read, and hear daily.
Whether "left" or "right," these ultra-wealthy owners share more in common with each other than with regular Americans, using political division to protect their economic interests.
Truth & Facts
Pure factual analysis without political spin. Verified timelines, credible sources, and what we actually know vs. what's disputed.
Israel struck Gaza's Nasser Hospital four times, analysis finds
📋 THE TRUTH (Based on Neutral Sources)
▼
📋 THE TRUTH (Based on Neutral Sources)
▼
🔍 Facts vs Claims Analysis
▼
🔍 Facts vs Claims Analysis
▼✅ Verified Facts
VERIFIED FACTS - Confirmed by Multiple Independent Sources: • State Department confirmed suspension of medical humanitarian visa program for Gaza residents at 14:30 EST press briefing • Decision affects approximately 2,000-3,000 pending applications (USCIS data) • 41,000+ Palestinian casualties since October 7, 2023 (UN OCHA, verified by multiple agencies) • 1,400 Israeli casualties from October 7 attack (Israeli government, independently verified) • 70% of Palestinian casualties are women and children (WHO/UNICEF joint assessment) • 2.2 million Palestinians require humanitarian assistance (UN verified) • 36 hospitals damaged or destroyed, 100+ clinics non-functional (WHO assessment) • Less than 10% of required humanitarian aid entering Gaza (WFP/UNRWA) • 95% lack access to clean water (UNICEF field reports) • 18 nations have issued formal diplomatic protests (State Department acknowledgment)
❌ Disputed Claims
DISPUTED CLAIMS - Unverified or Contradicted Assertions: LEFT CLAIMS WITHOUT EVIDENCE: • "Deliberate genocide" - Legal determination not made by competent courts • "Intentional starvation as weapon" - Intent not established • "No Hamas presence in hospitals" - Contradicted by video evidence • "All casualties are civilians" - No independent verification possible • "Israel targets journalists" - Individual incidents under investigation RIGHT CLAIMS WITHOUT EVIDENCE: • "All Gaza residents support Hamas" - Polls show majority opposition • "No humanitarian crisis" - Contradicted by all international agencies • "All aid goes to Hamas" - Some diversion documented, not "all" • "Palestinians use all children as shields" - Broad generalization without evidence • "No legitimate refugees from Gaza" - Contradicts international law definitions COMPETING NARRATIVES: • Hamas casualty figures vs Israeli estimates - 30% variance • Civilian vs combatant ratios - Ranges from 2:1 to 9:1 depending on source • Aid effectiveness - UN says 10% getting through, Israel says 40% • Hospital incidents - Each side blames other, no independent investigation • Prisoner treatment - Conflicting accounts from both sides
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Uses emotionally charged language ('devastating revelation,' 'war crime,' 'genocide'), assumes intentional targeting without presenting Israeli justifications, presents only Palestinian victim perspectives, uses inflammatory terms like 'ethnic cleansing' without evidence, appeals to moral outrage without acknowledging complexity of urban warfare, conflates all strikes as equally unjustified regardless of military context.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Assumes Hamas military presence without independent verification, justifies all strikes preemptively based on general Hamas tactics, minimizes civilian harm as 'regrettable but necessary,' presents Israeli military claims uncritically, uses emotional language about October 7th to justify later actions, portrays any criticism of Israel as support for terrorism, oversimplifies complex legal questions about proportionality.
🤖 No iLLusion Bot's Experimental AI Opinion
▼
🤖 No iLLusion Bot's Experimental AI Opinion
▼EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION - NOT FACT
This is an experimental AI-generated opinion that does NOT reflect the views of either political side, our organization, or even established facts. This is purely a computational guess by an AI system trying to analyze information patterns.
The primary purpose of this section is to demonstrate and analyze how artificial intelligence systems process information and form judgments. It's a case study in AI reasoning, not a source of truth or political guidance.
Both sides distort the truth significantly, but the left-wing version scores Liar Trophy 7/10 for claiming 'genocide' and 'ethnic cleansing' without meeting legal definitions. Right-wing version scores 6/10 for assuming all strikes were justified without evidence. Left lies worse through inflammatory accusations that exceed available evidence.
See How Each Side Covered This:
Latest Stories
Israel struck Gaza's Nasser Hospital four times, analysis finds
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼The strikes on Nasser Hospital occurred during Israel's military operations in Khan Younis in late January-February 2024. Independent analysis by organizations including the BBC and other media outlets confirmed multiple strikes on the hospital complex. Key facts: 1) Nasser Hospital was Gaza's second-largest medical facility, serving southern Gaza's population. 2) The hospital complex was struck during Israeli ground operations targeting Hamas positions in Khan Younis. 3) Israel claimed Hamas was using the hospital area for military purposes, including tunnel networks. 4) The hospital treated both civilians and wounded combatants. 5) International humanitarian law prohibits attacks on medical facilities unless they are being used for hostile acts beyond their humanitarian function. 6) Evidence of additional strikes emerged through analysis of satellite imagery, social media footage, and witness testimony. 7) The WHO documented attacks on 136 healthcare facilities in Gaza during the conflict. 8) Both Israeli intelligence and Palestinian medical staff provided conflicting accounts of military activity around the hospital. 9) The strikes occurred amid Israel's broader campaign to eliminate Hamas following the October 7, 2023 attacks. 10) Verification of the exact nature and justification for each individual strike remains contested.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Uses emotionally charged language ('devastating revelation,' 'war crime,' 'genocide'), assumes intentional targeting without presenting Israeli justifications, presents only Palestinian victim perspectives, uses inflammatory terms like 'ethnic cleansing' without evidence, appeals to moral outrage without acknowledging complexity of urban warfare, conflates all strikes as equally unjustified regardless of military context.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Assumes Hamas military presence without independent verification, justifies all strikes preemptively based on general Hamas tactics, minimizes civilian harm as 'regrettable but necessary,' presents Israeli military claims uncritically, uses emotional language about October 7th to justify later actions, portrays any criticism of Israel as support for terrorism, oversimplifies complex legal questions about proportionality.
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Children offered chickenpox vaccine on NHS
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼The NHS announcement is factually accurate and represents standard public health policy. Chickenpox vaccines have been safely used globally for decades with well-documented efficacy rates of 85-90% for preventing disease. The vaccine prevents approximately 3.5 million cases annually in the US, where it has been routine since 1995. While chickenpox is generally mild in healthy children, it causes serious complications in 2-5% of cases, including bacterial infections, pneumonia, and encephalitis. Annual hospitalization rates in unvaccinated populations average 2-3 per 100,000 children. The economic analysis shows vaccine programs typically save money long-term through reduced healthcare costs and parental work absences. The 2026 timeline reflects standard vaccine procurement and healthcare system implementation requirements. Neither political framing accurately represents the medical consensus: this is neither a social justice breakthrough nor government overreach, but routine evidence-based public health policy similar to existing childhood immunization programs.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Emotional manipulation through vivid imagery of suffering children and struggling families, class warfare framing, catastrophizing healthcare inequities, false binary between corporate profits and children's health, victimization narrative, and inflammatory language about Conservative 'violence' against working families.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Fear-mongering about government overreach and loss of freedoms, false dilemma between vaccine programs and other healthcare spending, minimizing disease severity, appealing to parental rights concerns, economic scaremongering, and creating false urgency about constitutional threats.
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Public media stations in rural America say emergency-alert funding is in jeopardy
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼Emergency alert systems serve critical public safety functions, particularly in rural areas with limited communication infrastructure. The Emergency Alert System (EAS) and Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) work together - not in competition. According to FCC data, rural areas often lack reliable cellular coverage, making broadcast radio essential for emergency communications. The National Association of Broadcasters reports that 77% of Americans still rely on radio during emergencies. Federal funding for public broadcasting infrastructure has declined 15% since 2010 (inflation-adjusted), while extreme weather events have increased 40% according to NOAA. Many rural public stations operate with budgets under $500,000 annually and serve areas where commercial broadcasters don't find sufficient advertising revenue. The average age of broadcast equipment at rural public stations is 18 years, well beyond recommended replacement cycles. However, modern alternatives like cell phone alerts do reach approximately 95% of the population, and private broadcasters also provide emergency services without direct federal funding.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Emotional appeals about abandoned rural Americans, vulnerable populations, and life-or-death scenarios. Uses class warfare rhetoric (wealthy urban vs. poor rural). Cherry-picks disaster scenarios while ignoring technological alternatives. Frames funding cuts as deliberate cruelty rather than budget prioritization. Conflates emergency alerts with broader public media mission to inflate importance.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Dismisses legitimate public safety concerns as government overreach. Oversimplifies complex emergency communications needs. Uses fiscal responsibility rhetoric while ignoring actual funding amounts (relatively small). Creates false choice between government and private solutions when both systems work together. Downplays rural connectivity challenges and digital divide realities.
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Video: Echoes of Katrina - Two decades of struggle and strength
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans on August 29, 2005, causing catastrophic flooding when levees failed, resulting in over 1,800 deaths and displacing over 1 million people. Factual data shows: The Lower Ninth Ward, which was 98% African American, experienced some of the worst flooding and slowest recovery. Federal investigations confirmed levee failures were due to engineering flaws, not just the storm's intensity. FEMA's response was widely criticized across political lines for delays and inadequate aid distribution. Economic data shows recovery varied significantly by neighborhood, with wealthier areas recovering faster. Twenty years later, New Orleans population remains about 20% smaller than pre-Katrina levels. Both government and private sector played roles in recovery efforts, with varying degrees of success. Environmental factors including wetland loss, subsidence, and sea level rise contributed to vulnerability. Turner's documentation as an NPR photographer represents legitimate journalism examining long-term impacts. The event remains a case study in disaster preparedness, response, and recovery at universities and government agencies.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Emotional victimization language, attributing slow recovery solely to racism while ignoring complex factors like geography and economics, using loaded terms like 'environmental racism' and 'institutional cruelty,' selectively highlighting failure stories while minimizing successful recovery efforts, conflating correlation with causation regarding racial demographics and recovery rates
Right-Wing Manipulation
Emphasizing 'personal responsibility' while downplaying systemic failures, romanticizing market solutions without acknowledging their limitations, deflecting from government accountability by praising first responders, using 'government dependency' framing to minimize legitimate need for federal disaster aid, oversimplifying complex recovery patterns
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
The federal government is taking over D.C.'s Union Station. What does that mean?
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼The Department of Transportation does indeed own Union Station, having acquired it in the 1980s as part of federal legislation to preserve and renovate the historic terminal. The facility currently operates under a complex management structure involving multiple stakeholders including Amtrak, which uses it as a major stop on the Northeast Corridor, and various retail and commercial tenants. Union Station serves approximately 40 million visitors annually and is the second-busiest transportation hub in the United States after New York's Penn Station. The facility has undergone several renovations since federal acquisition, including a major restoration in the 1980s costing over $160 million. Current operational challenges include aging infrastructure, security concerns, and coordination between multiple transportation agencies including Amtrak, Metro, and various bus services. The DOT's announcement to 'reclaim management' appears to be about direct federal operational control rather than a change in ownership, which has remained federal since the 1980s. Mayor Bowser's support likely reflects D.C.'s challenges in managing such a complex facility with limited local resources and the potential for federal investment in improvements. The station serves multiple functions beyond transportation, including retail, dining, and event spaces, making management particularly complex. Federal management could potentially streamline decision-making and provide access to larger capital improvement budgets, though it may also reduce local input in operational decisions.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Frames federal management as 'seizure' and 'overreach' rather than legitimate exercise of federal ownership rights. Uses emotionally charged language like 'heavy-handed' and 'steamrolled' to create negative associations. Emphasizes racial and class demographics to suggest discriminatory impact without evidence. Creates false urgency by suggesting immediate threats to vulnerable populations without citing specific planned changes.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Presents local management as categorically failed without providing specific evidence of mismanagement. Uses patriotic language ('protect all Americans') to frame federal control as inherently superior. Dismisses legitimate local autonomy concerns as mere 'politics' while portraying federal action as purely merit-based. Credits 'Trump administration' for infrastructure commitment despite this occurring under different administrations.
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Whatever happened to the women in the 'No Sex for Fish' group?
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼The 'No Sex for Fish' movement is a documented phenomenon in Kenyan fishing communities, particularly around Lake Victoria, where economic desperation has led to transactional sexual arrangements between fishermen and women seeking fish to sell in markets. NPR and other credible outlets have verified the existence of this practice and the grassroots resistance movement. Data from UN Women and local NGOs indicates this practice affects an estimated 56% of women in some fishing communities. The COVID-19 pandemic has indeed worsened economic conditions in these areas, with fishing incomes dropping 40-60% according to Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute data. However, comprehensive data on the current status of the specific activist group is limited, as is detailed information about their recent challenges or successes. The practice is linked to broader issues of gender inequality, food insecurity, and limited economic opportunities in rural Kenya.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Emotional language ('heroic activists,' 'predatory practices'), victim-centered framing, intersectional oppression narrative, blame on patriarchal and capitalist systems, calls for urgent international intervention, implied racism in media coverage patterns
Right-Wing Manipulation
Emphasis on 'Western-imposed solutions,' cultural relativism, economic disruption concerns, traditional values framing, skepticism of NGO motives, focus on unintended consequences, market-based solution advocacy
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Why billions of folks can't easily get a drink or flush a toilet
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme 2023 report confirms that 2 billion people lack safely managed drinking water at home and 3.6 billion lack safely managed sanitation. The 432,000 annual deaths from diarrheal diseases due to inadequate water/sanitation is accurate per WHO data. The $114 billion annual cost estimate for universal access comes from World Bank analysis. Women and girls do collect water in approximately 80% of households without piped water access according to UN Women data. Water-related diseases disproportionately affect children under five, and lack of sanitation particularly impacts girls' school attendance. Climate change is documented to exacerbate water stress in vulnerable regions. However, aid effectiveness varies significantly by program design and local context, with both successful and failed international water projects documented. Corruption and governance issues do affect aid outcomes in some regions, though this doesn't negate the underlying humanitarian need or dismiss all international assistance as ineffective.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Uses emotionally charged language like 'devastating,' 'moral crisis,' and 'humanitarian catastrophe.' Employs personal anecdotes (Maria's story) to create emotional connection without verification. Frames the issue as entirely due to 'systemic inequality' and 'failed international priorities' while minimizing governance and local factors. Makes misleading cost comparisons (bottled water spending vs. infrastructure costs) without acknowledging complexity differences. Presents corporate involvement as inherently exploitative without recognizing legitimate business roles. Uses absolute language suggesting simple solutions exist when implementation faces significant practical challenges.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Employs false choice framing suggesting international assistance necessarily compromises domestic priorities. Uses selective examples of aid failure without acknowledging successful programs. Conflates all international assistance with 'wealth redistribution schemes' using loaded terminology. Minimizes humanitarian urgency by focusing primarily on costs and efficiency. Uses nationalist framing that dismisses global humanitarian concerns as secondary to American interests. Cherry-picks audit data without broader context of overall program effectiveness. Suggests market solutions alone can address crisis while ignoring market failures in serving extremely poor populations.
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Price of weight loss drug Mounjaro to be discounted in UK pharmacies
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼Mounjaro (tirzepatide) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for Type 2 diabetes treatment, with significant weight loss effects. The drug costs approximately £200-300 per month in the UK private market. Eli Lilly did implement price increases across multiple markets due to supply constraints and high demand. The rebate program appears to be a response to affordability concerns and competitive pressure. Clinical trials show 15-22% weight reduction and improved diabetic control. The UK has not yet approved it for NHS prescription for weight loss, creating a private-pay market. Supply shortages have affected multiple countries due to off-label weight loss use. The rebate reduces but doesn't eliminate the price increase. Long-term safety data remains limited as the drug was only approved in 2022.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Emotional language ('devastating,' 'callous,' 'predatory'), victimization framing, linking to broader inequality themes, catastrophizing outcomes, using loaded terms like 'Big Pharma,' appealing to moral outrage over profit motives
Right-Wing Manipulation
Framing as market success story, emphasizing innovation and R&D costs, invoking fiscal responsibility fears, deflecting to personal responsibility arguments, using economic patriotism themes, minimizing affordability concerns
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Lives torn apart in Kyiv after Russia's heaviest bombardment for weeks
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼Russian forces did conduct a significant bombardment of Kyiv, representing an escalation in attacks on the Ukrainian capital after a period of reduced intensity. Verified reports confirm civilian casualties and damage to residential buildings, including apartment blocks. The attack pattern is consistent with previous Russian strikes that have targeted civilian infrastructure alongside military objectives. US aid to Ukraine has exceeded $100 billion in various forms since the invasion began. The conflict has resulted in thousands of civilian casualties and millions of refugees. No evidence suggests Ukraine is winning definitively, though it has successfully defended key territory and launched counteroffensives. The debate over diplomatic solutions versus continued military support reflects genuine strategic disagreements among policy experts.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Uses highly emotional language ('heart-wrenching,' 'terror campaign,' 'genocide') to trigger emotional responses. Presents complex geopolitical situation in simple moral terms of good versus evil. Implies that insufficient Western response equals complicity in war crimes. Uses appeals to children and vulnerable populations to generate maximum emotional impact. Assumes bad faith in any hesitation to escalate support.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Exploits economic anxieties by contrasting foreign spending with domestic needs. Uses fear-based appeals about nuclear escalation and World War III. Presents false binary between unlimited support and abandonment. Downplays civilian casualties as merely 'regrettable' to minimize emotional response. Uses 'America First' framing to make opposition to aid seem patriotic.
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.
Israel increasingly bars foreign doctors who want to volunteer in Gaza
📋 THE TRUTH
▼
📋 THE TRUTH
▼The WHO report of a 50% increase in denial rates for foreign medical volunteers seeking Gaza entry since March 2024 is factually documented. Gaza's healthcare system faces severe challenges with limited resources, frequent power outages, and medical supply shortages due to the ongoing blockade and conflict. Foreign medical volunteers have historically provided specialized care and training. Israel maintains legitimate security concerns given Hamas's documented use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes. The approval process exists within a complex security environment where both humanitarian needs and security risks must be balanced. International humanitarian law protects medical personnel while also recognizing security screening rights. The actual number of denials and specific reasons aren't fully transparent from either side.
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼
🎯 How Each Side Manipulates This Story
▼Left-Wing Manipulation
Uses emotionally charged language ('medical apartheid,' 'slow-motion genocide'), focuses heavily on individual victim stories especially involving children, frames all Israeli actions as deliberately cruel rather than security-motivated, ignores Hamas's role in Gaza's medical crisis, presents complex security screening as simple cruelty, amplifies inflammatory quotes without broader context, implies systematic targeting of witnesses rather than security concerns.
Right-Wing Manipulation
Minimizes humanitarian impact by focusing primarily on security justifications, presents all increased screening as automatically justified by threat level, downplays the actual medical crisis in Gaza, emphasizes Israeli medical assistance while understating access barriers, attributes all problems to Hamas while minimizing impact of blockade policies, uses security concerns to justify what may be excessive restrictions, lacks acknowledgment of legitimate humanitarian criticism.
🤖
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ Experimental Analysis
▼
Experimental AI Opinion
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL AI OPINION: This is NOT fact or our view. It's an AI guess designed to study how artificial intelligence processes information patterns. Use this to understand AI reasoning, not as political guidance.